On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> This is a rather ambiguous definition. How would join decide that two
> pieces of advice should be joined? Based on them having identical
> bodies? This strikes me as rather fragile, though. Similarly, when
> precisely would the combined advice match? Would the calls to foo and
> bar have to be in the same method? How many times would it match if foo
> was called once then bar was called several times? etc etc.
Sorry, that all sounded rather negative :-) It does sound like an
interesting idea, and we'd be very interested in helping you flesh it out.
Cheers,
Ganesh
Received on Fri Mar 11 22:35:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 23:50:05 BST