[Soot-list] Is there any way to get Soot to save the jimplified representations of the classes?

[Patrick LAM]

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Kin Keung Ma wrote:

> Could you tell me why it doesn't save time?
> I mean, what's the time mainly spent in when calling retrieveActiveBody()?
>
> And, is it possible to cache the JimpleBody through, say,
> ObjectOutputStream, that I can load it from file in the future?
> Thanks.

I don't remember the details.  I just remember that we were pretty excited
about being able to parse jimple, and then we were disappointed when we
were unable to make Soot go faster.

We have not tried ObjectOutputStream.

pat