[Soot-list] Potential Bug: soot.AbstractJasminClass:698 and 434

[Wouter De Borger]

Hi people,

I've been working with soot for a few weeks and I think I found a potential
bug,

I'm posting here before I go to bugzilla,

if I shouldn't, tell me.

I'm trying to emit a class attribute to jasmin, but AbstractJasminClass uses
Attribute.getValue() instead of JasminAttribute.getJasminValue(Map
instToLabel).

soot.baf.JasminClass overrides emitMethodBody and corrects the 'bug' for
method attributes.

Is it correct that it should not use getValue() or is this code written this
way for a reason. If so, what is this reason.

I hope I make sense

Wouter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.CS.McGill.CA/pipermail/soot-list/attachments/20071003/bd2023c9/attachment.htm