[Soot-list] Line number information in Grimp

[Mario Mendez-Lojo]

Hi,

I noticed that the line number information is lost when the bytecode output is 
obtained via grimp, instead of via jimple. Is this a bug, or is this the 
expected behavior given that the grimple transformation pipeline does not go 
through the 'tag' phase? It would be really useful to keep the line numbers, 
because in the presence of a runtime exception it's always easier to take a look 
at the Grimp to see what's wrong with our transformation than to take a look at 
the Jimple.

Thank you guys!