[Soot-list] Pattern matching in bytecode
Patrick Lam
plam at sable.mcgill.ca
Wed Oct 29 10:52:28 EDT 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Silviu ANDRICA wrote:
> Hello,
> thank you for the quick reply. Seeing that what I want is not
> possible, what if I go up a level, and express the sequence of
> instructions in Jimple? Would that help me?
You still have the problem that instructions may shift around. Pattern
matching in generated formats just isn't a good idea because there's no
canonical representation of these formats.
pat
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkkIeKwACgkQNTVxnNGEyOiB0gCfUMwD2kRHMaFYeyrEl5gnn0W6
7QsAoKIjpnGGqSyGdaaO5NpGeBxjSkkL
=N5pr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Soot-list
mailing list