[Soot-list] Correct type of locals, and correct line numbers

[Jochen Huck]

Hi,

it would be a long and possibly boring story to explain why I prefer the 
byte-code-like representation (my analysis computes def-use paths for a 
special purpose and the extra assignments are annoying) but if you are 
really interested I'll explain it in another mail.
Thanks for the hints.

Jochen

Am 23.07.2010 12:19, schrieb Eric Bodden:
>> Is
>> there a (simple) possibility to archive the byte-code-like jimple file when
>> analyzing source code?
>>      
> Hmmm, why would you prefer the one over the other? After all, the code
> is equivalent...
>
> The soot.toolkits.scalar.LocalSplitter may be doing something at least
> close to what you are looking for, though. Alternatively, use Shimple,
> the SSA version of Jimple.
>
> Eric
>