[Soot-list] Concurrent Analysis help - MhpAnalysis

Richard L. Halpert richhal22 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 30 23:49:37 EDT 2010


To answer question 1 from your original email: When you run MHP analysis as
a command-line option to Soot, it doesn't do *any* of the Parallel Execution
Graph stuff.  It actually runs the "SynchObliviousMhpAnalysis", which
ignores waits and notifys, computing MHP info based solely on start and join
statements.  It grabs those start statements and their targets from the call
graph, so if that's the only piece of MHP-related information that you need
then you should get it directly from the call graph like Eric suggested.

-Richard

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Arnab De <arnabde03 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Most probably this is due to the context-insensitivity of spark. We
> haven't tried with paddle yet.
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Eric Bodden
> <bodden at st.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> >> In the same analysis, if we use Runnable instead of extending Thread,
> >> the analysis returns all run methods for a start. Is there any way to
> >> make it more precise?
> >
> > Oh does it? I thought it would use points-to analysis to narrow down
> > the possible receivers. If that's not happening then I am not sure why
> > not. Normally points-to analysis ought to take care of this.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/pipermail/soot-list/attachments/20100630/75f37b2b/attachment.html 


More information about the Soot-list mailing list