[Soot-list] How to get signatures from a class that is at resolving level HIERARCHY

[Eric Bodden]

Hal, the following method could work:

soot.SootResolver.v().resolveClass("B", SootClass.SIGNATURES);

Eric

--
Dr. Eric Bodden
Software Technology Group, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Tel: +49 6151 16-5478    Fax: +49 6151 16-5410
Mailing Address: S2|02 A209, Hochschulstraße 10, 64289 Darmstadt



On 20 September 2010 05:55, Hal Hildebrand <hal.hildebrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I seem to be back in the weeds again.  Not sure if there's a way out, but I thought I'd ask the list for suggestions.
>
> I'm using the set_no_bodies_for_excluded option, and all that implies.  The setup is that I have three classes, A, B and C.  A and B are on the soot class path, and are excluded.  C is being processed, and in the body of a method of C I am transforming a method invocation on A to B.  I have the method reference to the method on A, and although the method is declared on B, I cannot retrieve the method reference because B is pinned at resolving level HIERARCHY.
>
> I believe I understand why this is happening, given that I do not reference B and thus the class is without method signatures.  What I am wondering  is whether there is some clever way around this trap I've set for myself.  The reason I'm using the set_no_bodies_for_excluded is because I cannot transform any method outside of the processing set and things get ugly pretty fast if I don't use that option.  Hopefully there's a way out of this, though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Hal
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>