[Soot-list] patch to allow adding methods during BodyTransformer

Eric Bodden eric.bodden at ec-spride.de
Tue Apr 17 07:39:07 EDT 2012


Phil, can you send me a minimal test case, i.e., a minimal extension
to Soot that triggers the problem you mention? I can then try to
assist you in finding a minimal patch.

Cheers,
Eric

On 16 April 2012 15:54, Phil Pratt-Szeliga <pcpratts at syr.edu> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Ah yes. We could also just use the return value from
> SootClass.getMethods(). If we do this we have to make getMethods
> return methodList rather than a copy. I don't know if that will break
> other code yet, I haven't had time to setup executing the test cases
> you have.
>
> Phil
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden at ec-spride.de> wrote:
>> Hi Phil.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. I had a brief look. One question: Is it really
>> necessary to have this method-queue field? Does this field not just
>> hold a copy of the method list?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eric



-- 
Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://bodden.de/
Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
Principal Investigator in Secure Services at CASED
Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293 Darmstadt


More information about the Soot-list mailing list