[Soot-list] How does Jimple preserve semantics with its partial SSA without Phi-node mechanism?? (with an example illustrating my idea)
Quentin Sabah
quentin.sabah at inria.fr
Thu Jul 12 05:34:58 EDT 2012
Hello,
> Hello,
>
> If I understand correctly, Jimple introduces a unique names for each use of local variable, but Jimple does not use Phi-node. So I wonder how Jimple preserves the semantics? My question is more clear with the following example:
Jimple is not SSA, Shimple is. Jimple use a local variable for each value location (stack, variable).
For your example, I believe the ; after the while condition is your bug.
while (x<10);{
--
Quentin Sabah, CIFRE Ph.D. student
Grenoble University
INRIA-SARDES | STMicroelectronics/AST
Montbonnot, France | Grenoble, France
mailto:quentin.sabah at inria.fr | mailto:quentin.sabah at st.com
phone: +33 476 61 52 42 | phone: +33 476 58 44 14
More information about the Soot-list
mailing list