[Soot-list] about the CFG of Jimple code

[Eric Bodden]

Hello.

Yes I think they should be the same, given that the original .jimple
file was produced from the same bytecode. Writing out .jimple file and
reading this file in again should give you the same Jimple.

Eric

On 4 April 2013 15:44,  <yuffonzhang at 163.com> wrote:
> yes, it is.  I want to know whether the cfg of jimple file and that of the bytecode are the  same.
>
>
> 在 2013-04-04 00:14:49，"Eric Bodden" <eric.bodden at ec-spride.de> 写道：
>>So are you asking whether CFGs produced from .jimple files have the
>>same structure as the ones produced from .class files?
>>
>>Eric
>>
>>On 24 March 2013 04:55, Zhang Yufeng <yuffonzhang at 163.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Does the CFG from Jimple have the same structure as that from bytecode?
>>> In my project, after I get a log of a path in the bytecode(consisting of a
>>> sequence of log of yes\no on branches),
>>> I want to retrive the path on the CFG.
>>> So the structure of the CFG is important to me.
>>> I have tried several examples, and find that the structure is the same as
>>> that in the bytecode.
>>> But I am still not sure about this.
>>> Is there anybody know this?
>>> Thank you.
>>> Yufeng
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Soot-list mailing list
>>> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
>>> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://sse.ec-spride.de/ http://bodden.de/
>>Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
>>Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
>>Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293 Darmstadt
>



-- 
Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://sse.ec-spride.de/ http://bodden.de/
Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293 Darmstadt