[Soot-list] LOC in Dacapo-2006 benchmark

[Eric Bodden]

It seems to me that you are not actually counting lines of code but
you are counting units. That's something entirely different. The
Dacapo paper is surely talking about source-code lines.

Eric

On 30 January 2013 09:25, Zhoulai <zell08v at orange.fr> wrote:
> Thank you a lot, Xiao.  Among others, I was doing a small benchmark with
> geometric encoding. Luckily the bad result is not yet submitted!
>
> But, the problem is now, why I counted 182 109 LOC for 'fop' benchmark using
> the same Soot options? I am running soot from Eclipse, but without that
> plugin. I run soot.Main.main with className  dacapo.fop.Main. This file by
> itself should not contain 182109 lines, shouldn't it?  I used -app option.
> The document of soot command line says,
>
> -app
> Run in application mode, processing all classes referenced by argument
> classes.
>
> How does Soot get all class referenced by argument class? By a call-graph I
> suppose? It is not sufficient to read Soot's document. One needs to guess:(
> Sorry  I feel totally confused.
>
> So how can I count so few LOC for xalan, yet  so many for fop, using the
> same soot options!!??
>
> Zell.
>
> p.s.
>
> Here is how I specify the class file name.
>
>         ...
>         String dacapoName=config.getProperty(Configuration.DACAPONAME);
>         String
> JRE14="/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4/Classes/jce.jar:/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4/Classes/classes.jar";
>
>      String sootClassPath=JRE14+":"+prePath+"/"+dacapoName+".jar"+":"
>                 + prePath+"/"+dacapoName+"-deps.jar";
>
>         className="dacapo."+dacapoName+".Main";
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Richard Xiao <richardxx at cse.ust.hk> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Your code "SootClass c: Scene.v().getApplicationClasses()", that only
>> counts the methods manually provided in your soot command line.
>>
>> Please obtain the reachable methods from CallGraph.ReachableMethods()
>> function:
>> http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/soot/doc/soot/jimple/toolkits/callgraph/ReachableMethods.html
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Xiao
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Zhoulai <zell08v at orange.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank  you for your quick reply.
>>>
>>> The codes for LOC counting is mixed in the project. But basically,  it is
>>> computed iteratively (accumulated in TotalLoc below) the LOC of all the
>>> reachable methods from Main.
>>> //*** The computation of LOC is here//
>>>        TotalLOC = 0;
>>>         for (SootClass sc: class2profiles.keySet()){
>>>
>>>             for (Profile pf: class2profiles.get(sc)){
>>>                 totalLOC+=pf.getBody().getUnits().size();
>>>               }
>>>        }
>>>
>>> //*** my analysis is basically here, which collects reachable method from
>>> Main,
>>>     public MySceneTransformer(Map<SootClass, ArrayList<Profile>>
>>> class2profiles) {
>>>         this.class2profiles=class2profiles;
>>>
>>>         @Override
>>>         protected void internalTransform(String phaseName, Map options) {
>>>          public Map<SootClass, ArrayList<Profile>> class2profiles;
>>>           for (SootClass  c: Scene.v().getApplicationClasses()){
>>>               ArrayList<Profile> profiles = new ArrayList<Profile>();
>>>               for (SootMethod sm:  c.getMethods()){
>>>               ...
>>>                    if (!sm.isConcrete() || sm.getName().equals("<init>"))
>>>                     continue;
>>>             ...
>>>             profiles.add(sm);
>>>           }
>>>          class2profiles.put(c,profiles)
>>> }
>>>
>>> Any idea?
>>> Zell.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Tony Yan <yan at cse.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can you show the code to count LOC?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Zhoulai <zell08v at orange.fr> wrote:
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > Recently, I analyzed Dacapo-2006 using soot. I find the LOC that I got
>>>> > for
>>>> > the benchmark is much less than the one in your 2006's oopsla paper.
>>>> >
>>>> > In particular, I find xalan has only 4786 LOC, hsqldb has 5634 LOC,
>>>> > fop has
>>>> > 182109 LO . I am aware of issues related to whether to count LOC of
>>>> > library
>>>> > class. But I am using the options that maximal LOC could have been
>>>> > collected
>>>> > started from main class.
>>>> >
>>>> > The options I used include: -pp, -w, -app, and the following
>>>> >
>>>> >            sootArgs.add("-include");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("org.apache.");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("-include");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("org.w3c.");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("-p");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("cg.spark");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("enabled:true");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("-p");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("cg.spark");
>>>> >             sootArgs.add("on-fly-cg:true");
>>>> >
>>>> > Do you think it is normal to have 4786 LOC for xalan?
>>>> >
>>>> > Zell.
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Soot-list mailing list
>>>> > Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
>>>> > http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Soot-list mailing list
>>> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
>>> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Richard Xiao Xiao
>> PhD Student @ CSE @ Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
>> www.cse.ust.hk/~richardxx
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Soot-list mailing list
>> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
>> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>



-- 
Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://sse.ec-spride.de/ http://bodden.de/
Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293 Darmstadt