[Soot-list] How to deal with "Return" using wjop.si from SOOT?

[Zhoulai]

Hi, Quentin, I didnot know these.  Thank you very much.

 --Zhoulai

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Quentin Sabah <quentin.sabah at inria.fr>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > In conclusion, SOOT inlines 'return', but if the invoke statement is
> > removed during the optimsation phase,  of course we cannot see the the
> > inlined code.
>
> If you really need to track these returned values even if they are not
> used, you could try to disable these optimizations:
>   - Unused Local Eliminator (jb.ule)
>   - Post-copy propagation Unused Local Eliminator (jb.cp-ule)
>   - Dead Assignment Eliminator (jj.dae)
>
>
> --
> Quentin Sabah, CIFRE Ph.D. student
> Grenoble University
> INRIA-SPADES                   | STMicroelectronics/AST
> Montbonnot, France             | Grenoble, France
> mailto:quentin.sabah at inria.fr  | mailto:quentin.sabah at st.com
> phone: +33 476 61 54 57        | phone: +33 476 58 44 14
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/pipermail/soot-list/attachments/20130522/3d4e940b/attachment.html