Re: [abc] Bytecode offset in SJP signature?

From: Julian Tibble <julian.tibble@worcester.oxford.ac.uk>
Date: Sun Sep 12 2004 - 01:50:30 BST

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) In message <20040911134817.B14054@sable.mcgill.ca> abc@comlab.ox.ac.uk writes:
> On a related note, I was looking at eaj a little bit. In EajFactory,
> there are several methods of the form:
>
> foo(parameters) {
> super.foo(parameters);
> }
>
> Why are they necessary? Shouldn't method dispatch just find them in the
> superclass?

Yes, I've cleaned it up now.

I can't remember the reason it was like that to begin with. I think
it was something to do with having issues with some classes being
private to the org.aspectj runtime and we didn't want to change that
runtime, but at the same time we didn't want to copy large chunks of
it. Anyway, it doesn't make sense and it's fixed now.

Julian
Received on Sun Sep 12 01:50:34 2004