Re: [abc] Bytecode offset in SJP signature?

From: Ganesh Sittampalam <Ganesh.Sittampalam@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 02:27:13 BST

Some very weakly held opinions:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004, Ondrej Lhotak wrote:

> Should I make this an abc extension, or is it generally useful enough
> that we should provide it natively in abc?

Hmm. Personally I think it should be an extension, leaving the core of abc
as just an AspectJ implementation.

> In the former case, should it be part of the eaj extension, or a
> separate extension? Have we decided how we will handle extension
> composition?

Pending a good solution for extension composition, which I suspect may
involve not using Polyglot, I think it should be part of eaj.

> For either case, does anyone
> have opinions on where the bytecode information should go? I could
> either add it to SourceLocation, or make a new BytecodeLocation and
> getter method in JoinPoint and JoinPoint.StaticPart.

BytecodeLocation sounds most appropriate.

Cheers,

Ganesh
Received on Mon Sep 13 02:27:24 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 13 2004 - 16:00:02 BST