Re: [abc] A comment from Nasko Rountev

yes, the hpc crowd at Manchester also wants this sort of thing (in
particular joinpoints for loop iteration)- see
the paper by Harbulot and Gurd in AOSD 2004.

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Prof. Laurie HENDREN wrote:

> I think this is a good topic to mention as possible future extensions
> in the AOSD paper. I think we already have some control-flow type
> pointcuts on our list, and here we can see a concrete use of them.
>
> Cheers, Laurie
>
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
> | McGill University |
> | 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
> | 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
> | Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
> | CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, 'Ondrej Lhotak' wrote:
>
> > I've received an e-mail from Nasko Rountev about various things he's up
> > to. He's interested in using abc for instrumentation. Since we're all
> > interested in user comments, I'm passing his comments/questions along.
> > It's something to think about for future extensions/extensibility.
> >
> > Ondrej
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from Atanas Rountev <rountev@cse.ohio-state.edu> -----
> >
> > <... non-abc stuff deleted ...>
> >
> > > 3. I am also interested in the dynamic analysis stuff - in particular, good ways
> > > to get instrumentation all over the place. Right now we are using Soot to create
> > > instrumented bytecode (we just add a bunch of Jimple statements wherever we
> > > need), but as a long-term solution something based on aspects seems a better
> > > choice. I would be very curious to learn about your experience with "abc" in
> > > terms of setting up all kinds of crazy dynamic analyses. In particular, does
> > > "abc" allow CFG edge/node instrumentation? Of course, there isn't an explicit
> > > CFG, but there is an implicit one in the bytecode.
> > >
> > > Nasko
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 22 15:04:30 2004