Re: [abc] test run results (with re-weaving)

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 06:26:48PM +0200, Aske Simon Christensen wrote:
> Quoting Ondrej LHOTAK <olhotak@sable.mcgill.ca>:
>
> > Pass: 609 (down 263)
> > Fail: 282 (up 263)
> > Skipped: 103 (no change)
>
> Shouldn't these reweaving run results be relative to the last reweaving run,
> rather than the normal run?

When I was in Oxford, Ganesh and I agreed that eventually, the reweaving
run would become the normal run, so that everyone would be discouraged
from breaking re-weaving in their code (or encouraged to fix their code
in cases where it breaks re-weaving). I guess that hasn't happened yet.

I'm not sure how the script knows what the previous "official" test run
result was, and I don't want to mess up the functioning of the
"official" test runs.

Ondrej

>
> -Aske
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 23 17:47:35 2004