Re: [abc] test run results

From: Ondrej Lhotak <olhotak@sable.mcgill.ca>
Date: Fri Sep 24 2004 - 16:00:12 BST

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:39:20AM -0400, Prof. Laurie HENDREN wrote:
> > Surely if we're aiming for ajc's "'implements' and 'extends' are
> > interchangeable in 'declare parents'", the thing to do would be to
> > change <class> implements <class> into <class> extends <class> internally?
> >
> > Or does that have an associated set of pitfalls?
> >
> > - P
> >
>
> That's a good point .... can we do that?

I think we can quite easily. The issue is not whether we can, but
whether we want to. Do we want to cave in and allow people to say
implements when they mean extends, or do we want to put our foot down
and say that saying <class> implements <class> when you really mean
extends is just stupid, and we won't allow it.

Ondrej

>
> Laurie
>
>
>
Received on Fri Sep 24 16:03:33 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 24 2004 - 16:20:02 BST