> Personally I think it is worthwhile to spend tomorrow on making
> a few more improvements:
> a) check references (as suggested above, but also just the
> details of publication venue etc)
> b) look for further typos, obscurities etc.
> c) run the whole thing through a spell checker
Certainly it is well worth doing all of those things ..... I guess I
had those in my mind as the "minor" things to do.
>
> A good technique (and I'm not joking here) is to read the
> paper backwards at this stage. If you read it forwards, it
> all goes "yeah, seen that before, obvious..." and you read what
> you think, not what's written.
aedi doog.
Laurie
Received on Tue Sep 28 23:30:16 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 28 2004 - 23:40:02 BST