Under what circumstances can they throw an exception ... (I think only
if called during the init of the aspect class?) ... is that correct?
Cheers, Laurie
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
| McGill University |
| 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
| 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
| Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
| CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
| http://wwww.sable.mcgill.ca http://aspectbench.org |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Sascha Kuzins wrote:
>
> Hi Laurie!
> > - around inlining - Sascha ... did you want to play a bit with your
> > more tuned inliners? Are there better experiments to do now?
> > - also Chris G. noticed that after your do your inlining there are
> > often dead calls to AspectOf() ... can these be removed?
> I'm working on this. The dead calls cannot be removed because they have
> the possible side effect of throwing an exception.
> (One idea to optimize this is to transform singleton aspects by making
> all members static and not having any real aspect instance if there are
> no derived aspects, but that's not feasible in the short term.)
>
> Sascha
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 8 14:07:48 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 14:30:04 BST