Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Sascha Kuzins wrote:
>
>
>>However, I'm not sure we can preserve the behavior in the case of low
>>memory conditions, that is if the aspect instance simply isn't created
>
>
> I don't think we should feel any obligation to preserve that kind of
> exception. It's asynchronous and essentially non-deterministic.
Well, but if the aspect hasn't been instantiated, then advice that does
not reference the aspect instance would nevertheless execute (because
AspectOf() has been optimized away) and other advice that does refer to
the instance would not execute. That does not feel right.
Sascha
>
> Ganesh
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 8 15:24:34 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 15:50:04 BST