Re: [abc] around times

Hi Sascha,

for sim-nullptr - what would the differences be - for the code
generated by abcforceinline and ajc121. Will they look basically
the same?

Ondrej,

I want to check what the effect of Soot is on this benchmark (i.e.
compile it with ajc121 and with soot, without the aspect, and compare
the execution times). Where can I find the source code and the
params used to time it?

Cheers, Laurie

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
| McGill University |
| 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
| 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
| Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
| CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
| http://wwww.sable.mcgill.ca http://aspectbench.org |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Ondrej LHOTAK wrote:

> Here are the times for the around benchmarks:
>
>
> sim-nullptr
> abc: Avg : 25.95
> abcforceinline: Avg : 23.71
> abcnoinline: Avg : 24.806
> ajc121: Avg : 22.5
>
> sim-nullptr-rec
> abc: Avg : 25.28
> abcforceinline: Avg : 23.282
> abcnoinline: Avg : 25.77
> ajc121: Avg : 127.07
>
> weka-nullptr
> abc: Avg : 16.018
> abcforceinline: Avg : 15.52
> abcnoinline: Avg : 15.888
> ajc121: Avg : 14.188
>
> weka-nullptr-rec
> abc: Avg : 16.53
> abcforceinline: Avg : 15.42
> abcnoinline: Avg : 16.356
> ajc121: Avg : 42.81
>
> ants-delayedoutput
> abc: Avg : 17.142
> abcforceinline: Avg : 17.212
> abcnoinline: Avg : 17.204
> ajc121: Avg : 18.016
>
> ants-profiler
> abc: Avg : 21.942
> abcforceinline: Avg : 19.228
> abcnoinline: Avg : 22.178
> ajc121: Avg : 21.35
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 12 22:44:54 2005