Re: [abc] oopsla paper

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Ondrej Lhotak wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:00:06PM -0400, Laurie Hendren wrote:
>> All other authors, we need some proof readers. Who is available to
>> go through the paper carefully?
>
> I've just finished a complete pass over the paper.

I'm going to have a go through it tonight (i.e. now).

> 2) In Related Work, near the end of the section on Douence et al, is
> the phrase "in that paper, the code is LITTERED with explicit equality
> tests". Were we supposed to be nice to them in the related work? Is
> "littered" the word we want to use?

I agree that we should change this. We can give the same general
impression without sounding quite so insulting, e.g. "the code has many
explicit equality tests".

Ganesh
Received on Wed Aug 10 20:41:44 2005