RE: [abc] J-LO benchmark results

From: Oege de Moor <Oege.de.Moor@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat Mar 04 2006 - 22:14:24 GMT

ok, thanks for clarifying that

On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Eric Bodden wrote:

> Ok, now I see the difference. J-LO _is_ correct. It is just about the
> semantics again...
Received on Sat Mar 04 22:14:25 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Eric Bodden: "[abc] J-LO"
Previous message: Oege de Moor: "Re: [abc] Cardinal suddenly showing strange performance results"
In reply to: Eric Bodden: "RE: [abc] J-LO benchmark results"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 06 2007 - 16:13:27 GMT