RE: [abc] LOR results

Great!

Eric, I think it's not right to use "*" for two purposes in the table,
namely for "cannot be expressed" and for "took too long to wait".
For that latter, please insert something like ">3600", or however long
you decided to wait.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Majordomo list server [mailto:majordomo@comlab.ox.ac.uk] On Behalf
> Of Eric Bodden
> Sent: 14 March 2006 07:30
> To: abc@comlab.ox.ac.uk
> Subject: [abc] LOR results
>
> Hello all.
>
> My aplologies for taking so long with the LOR resuls but here they are:
>
> http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~ebodde/data/results%20lor.htm
>
> So we do have a slight overhead compared to the native AJ version but not
> too much I would say. Interestingly the versionwith Indexing uses more
> memory here (We have more maps I suppose?) and turning *off* collectable
> weak refs saves memory (?) - I don't have an explanation for this latter
> fact. Do you have any idea?
>
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Received on Tue Mar 14 08:31:42 2006