Re: [abc] oopsla outline

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:34:06AM +0000, Oege de Moor wrote:
>
> Great, many thanks.
>
> I gave it a very quick read (I'm about to leave my internet connection). It
> looks very nice.

Happy to hear that.

> The section on "contains" would perhaps be better if we give a better idea
> what the analysis of the pattern for LUInMeth would do. Can we provide a
> little more detail than what's there now?

Neil added that section. I will coordinate with him and add detail
about the possible analyses we could do.

Ondrej

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Majordomo list server [mailto:majordomo@comlab.ox.ac.uk] On Behalf
> > Of Ondrej Lhotak
> > Sent: 13 March 2006 20:52
> > To: abc@comlab.ox.ac.uk
> > Subject: Re: [abc] oopsla outline
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:42:02PM +0000, Oege de Moor wrote:
> > > Here's a rough plan of how we might proceed to produce a draft.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Ondrej: paper future work (section 5)
> >
> > I've got an initial draft checked into CVS. Those of you proofreading,
> > please have a look at it. I'd especially like to know whether Oege
> > and Eric agree with it. I've budgeted time for it again on Wednesday...
> >
> > Ondrej
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 14 13:40:18 2006