RE: comparison between native gcj and bytecode

["Erik Poupaert" <erik.poupaert@chello.be>]

>>>> But why should we choose? It seems obvious to me that future compiler
>>>> technology will use *both* aggressive static analysis *and* dynamic
>>>> compilation of specialisations (the latter presumably tightly guided by
>>>> the former).

This approach is bound to have its merits, but it sounds absolutely
non-trivial. Neither the JDK nor GCJ are implementing it, or as far as I
know, planning to implement it. I'd love to see such novel approach
attempted, though.