Re: [abc-dev] Pass scheduling

It would, except for one little detail,

timer (and debug) are called after each stage instead of before it,.....

the progress bar would then constantly display the information about the
previous stage instead of the current stage.

The best solution is not using the progress bar at all.

Wouter

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden_at_mail.mcgill.ca>wrote:

> > if you think the monitor is a good idea, I'll add it to one compile
> > sequence.
> > but I don't know if it's worth the effort if there are many sequences
> (with
> > only minor differences)
>
>
> In the long term we would want to get rid of much of the redundancy in
> the different versions of CompileSequence anyway. It's one of the few
> classes in abc that's not really extensible right now - too bad that
> you have to deal with exactly that class. I think adding calls to the
> monitor would not hurt a lot, though (certainly not in terms of
> performance). On the other hand it seems a bit redundant when compared
> to the class abc.main.AbcTimer, which already exists in abc. I wonder
> if that class is not sufficient for your needs (or an extension of it)
> and if it would not suffice to just add a few calls to that class at
> the places you care about.
>
> Eric
>
> --
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada
>
>
Received on Wed Aug 13 2008 - 14:45:41 BST