Nathan, can you not just attach your tags to the method
abc$perThisBind in this case?
The fact that you have multiple aspect instances at runtime should not
really matter because there's still only *one* such method. There are
just multiple *calls* to this method inserted by PetThisSetup.
Eric
2008/5/14 Nathan Weston <npweston_at_gmail.com>:
> Thanks Eric!  The difficulty is that I'm doing pre-analysis of advices
>  and attaching the results to SootMethods as tags, which I then retrieve
>  after weaving.  This is possible with AdviceDecls, but I guess it's more
>  difficult when the advice applies perThis as the instances of the advice
>  are different?
>
>  Nathan
>
>
>
>
>  Eric Bodden wrote:
>
> > Or another way you could look at it is that the advice body will
> > always be called "abc$perThisBind', as this is the method for which a
> > call is being inserted at the shadow.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > 2008/5/13 Eric Bodden <eric.bodden_at_mail.mcgill.ca>:
> >
> > > Hi Nathan.
> > >
> > >  Looking at the code I believe that the reason for not providing this
> > >  method is that there is no method being generated for PerThisSetup. If
> > >  I am not mistaken, all the functionality is implemented within
> > >  makeAdviceExecutionStmts, which just adds a bunch of statements to the
> > >  shadow (and no method call to an advice body).
> > >
> > >  Eric
> > >
> > >  2008/5/13 Nathan Weston <npweston_at_gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > >  >
> > >  >  Is it possible to obtain the SootMethod implementation of a
> PerSetupAdvice,
> > >  > especially a PerThisSetup?  I mean in a similar method to
> > >  > getImpl().getSootMethod() for an AdviceDecl.
> > >  >
> > >  >  Thanks for any help!
> > >  >  Nathan
> > >  >
> > >  >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  --
> > >  Eric Bodden
> > >  Sable Research Group
> > >  McGill University, Montréal, Canada
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
-- Eric Bodden Sable Research Group McGill University, Montréal, CanadaReceived on Wed May 14 2008 - 15:01:01 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 14 2008 - 15:20:12 BST