[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sablecc grammar (help!)

To: Etienne Gagnon <egagnon@sprynet.com>
Subject: Re: sablecc grammar (help!)
From: Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 21:31:52 -0400
Cc: sablecc-list@sable.mcgill.ca
In-Reply-To: <001501bdc54c$b3870a80$323c9ad1@default>; from Etienne Gagnon on Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 01:23:02PM -0400
References: <001501bdc54c$b3870a80$323c9ad1@default>

Montreal Tue Aug 11 21:28:48 1998

Etienne Gagnon <egagnon@sprynet.com> wrote:
> is not LALR(1). These tools are faster than SableCC because they are written
> in C and they are not interpreted by a slow virtual machine. Therefore, if

I suspect the main reason that SableCC is slower is because of the
number of files it has to generate -- one or more per node.  It would
seem to make some sense that the disk is the limiting factor here.

Navin

References:
- Re: sablecc grammar (help!)
  - From: "Etienne Gagnon" <egagnon@sprynet.com>
- Re: sablecc grammar (help!)
  - From: "Etienne Gagnon" <egagnon@sprynet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: sablecc grammar (help!)
Next by Date: Parser Error: can't find the trigger
Prev by thread: Re: sablecc grammar (help!)
Next by thread: Parser Error: can't find the trigger
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread