[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sablecc grammar (help!)

Montreal Tue Aug 11 21:28:48 1998

Etienne Gagnon <egagnon@sprynet.com> wrote:
> is not LALR(1). These tools are faster than SableCC because they are written
> in C and they are not interpreted by a slow virtual machine. Therefore, if

I suspect the main reason that SableCC is slower is because of the
number of files it has to generate -- one or more per node.  It would
seem to make some sense that the disk is the limiting factor here.