[Soot-list] Re: Getting Grimp in a CallGraph without outputting files

[David Glasser]

On 5/22/06, David Glasser <glasser at mit.edu> wrote:
> On 5/22/06, David Glasser <glasser at mit.edu> wrote:
> > I'm using Soot for some analysis of Java code. Since I'm not trying to
> > optimize the bytecode or anything, I've turned off output generation
> > (ie, "-f n").
> >
> > I'm using the CallGraph feature pretty heavily. I would really like to
> > have the call graph built on Grimp bodies, not Jimple bodies.  Is
> > there a way to get it to generate Grimp internally without also making
> > a sootOutput full of files I don't need?  (When I just need Grimp
> > inside a BodyTransformer, I've been manually doing body =
> > Grimp.v().getBody(body, "gb") or something, but this won't help me
> > with the CallGraph!)
>
> In fact, even using "-f g" doesn't seem to make the CallGraph use the
> grimped bodies.

[Sorry to keep replying to myself]

And the reason is clear: cg gets run before the body packs like gb.

But is there any way to achieve what I want?

-- 
David Glasser | glasser at mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/