[Soot-list] Re: Getting Grimp in a CallGraph without outputting files

[David Glasser]

On 5/22/06, David Glasser <glasser at mit.edu> wrote:
> I'm using Soot for some analysis of Java code. Since I'm not trying to
> optimize the bytecode or anything, I've turned off output generation
> (ie, "-f n").
>
> I'm using the CallGraph feature pretty heavily. I would really like to
> have the call graph built on Grimp bodies, not Jimple bodies.  Is
> there a way to get it to generate Grimp internally without also making
> a sootOutput full of files I don't need?  (When I just need Grimp
> inside a BodyTransformer, I've been manually doing body =
> Grimp.v().getBody(body, "gb") or something, but this won't help me
> with the CallGraph!)

In fact, even using "-f g" doesn't seem to make the CallGraph use the
grimped bodies.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser at mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/