[Soot-list] jdk 1.5 partial support.
joe.pellegrino at lakota-tsi.com
Wed Jul 18 10:52:43 EDT 2007
OK, thats great. :) Thanks for your help and time. Let me know if and when
you find anything. :)
From: eric.bodden at googlemail.com [mailto:eric.bodden at googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Eric Bodden
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:51 AM
To: Joe Pellegrino; mbatch at cs.mcgill.ca
Cc: soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
Subject: Re: [Soot-list] jdk 1.5 partial support.
I suspect a but in the obfuscator. I will look into it when I have tim
e(probably not before next week, though.)
On 18/07/07, Eric Bodden <eric.bodden at mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> ... and your Soot command line, please.
> On 18/07/07, Joe Pellegrino <joe.pellegrino at lakota-tsi.com> wrote:
> > Java version:
> > [jpellegr at fatboy gui]$ javac -version
> > javac 1.5.0_07
> > [jpellegr at fatboy gui]$ java -version
> > java version "1.5.0_07"
> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03)
> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_07-b03, mixed mode, sharing)
> > Attached is the java source I am using to test with a jar file I created
> > from the compiled source and the o file is the output from the run that
> > the crash below. The crash is about halfway down.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Pickett [mailto:chris.pickett at mail.mcgill.ca]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 10:25 AM
> > To: Joe Pellegrino
> > Cc: soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> > Subject: Re: [Soot-list] jdk 1.5 partial support.
> > Hi Joe,
> > Joe Pellegrino wrote:
> > > I noticed on the installation instructions it mentions 'partial'
> > for
> > > jdk 1.5. What does that mean? Could that be the cause of the crash
> > > produced:
> > >
> > > 169 load.r r0 [***missing***]
> > > 170 jsr pop 10 [***missing***]
> > > java.lang.RuntimeException: Problem with stack height at: goto
> > specialinvoke
> > > <java.lang.Object: void <init>()>
> > >
> > > Has Stack  but is expecting 
> > >
> > > I ask because I did get this to work on a laptop using jdk1.4 I
> > > whereas on the machine that produced the above output was using java
> > > 1.5.0_09. Anyone have some advice?
> > Attach a test case so that people here can reproduce your problem.
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > Soot-list mailing list
> > Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> > http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
> Eric Bodden
> Sable Research Group
> McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Sable Research Group
McGill University, Montréal, Canada
More information about the Soot-list