[Soot-list] Bytecode generated by Soot

[Eric Bodden]

Hi Mario.

In general it could be faster or slower. I think in general you won't
see much of a difference at all, though. I don't think that anybody
has ever studied that. From what I remember, Soot applies some few
optimizations by default, so probably the code would rather run a
little faster than slower.

Eric

2009/2/12 Mario Mendez-Lojo <marioml at ices.utexas.edu>:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm using Soot to modify bytecode in a system that it's oriented to high
> performance. Therefore, I have a question: do you have any idea about how
> optimized is the bytecode generated by the standard bytecode-jimple-baf-bytecode
>  processing sequence? Let's assume that my transformation does not generate any
> extra code, or too little code to affect performance, and that "jop" is
> deactivated. It's the output bytecode any slower (or faster) than the original?
>
> Thank you,
> Mario
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>



-- 
Eric Bodden
Sable Research Group, McGill University
Montréal, Québec, Canada