[Soot-list] Pre-processing of Jimple Code

Aaloan Miftah aaloanmiftah at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 4 08:40:06 EDT 2012


Hi Eric,

We could have transformation phases specifically for class files (at the moment there is a body & scene transformer, no class transformer).

Regards,
Aaloan


________________________________
 From: Eric Bodden <eric.bodden at ec-spride.de>
To: Soot list <soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca> 
Cc: Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 2:24 AM
Subject: [Soot-list] Pre-processing of Jimple Code
 
Hi all.

I have now repeatedly had reports of people who are trying to modify
Jimple code (adding methods etc.) before analysis. For this reason,
some time ago I added two new packs, wjpp and wspp, which both run at
the very beginning, but *only* if whole-program mode is enabled. This
causes trouble for people who are not interested in running in
whole-program mode, due to the associated costs.

Hence, I am now thinking of either modifying the PackManager to run
wjpp and wspp unconditionally, no matter whether -w is enabled, or to
add another pack that will be run unconditionally. I wonder what
people would prefer or if someone has an even better idea.

Best wishes,
Eric

-- 
Eric Bodden, Ph.D., http://bodden.de/
Head of Secure Software Engineering Group at EC SPRIDE
Principal Investigator in Secure Services at CASED
Tel: +49 6151 16-75422    Fax: +49 6151 16-72051
Room 3.2.14, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293 Darmstadt
_______________________________________________
Soot-list mailing list
Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/pipermail/soot-list/attachments/20120404/ae14c7f8/attachment.html 


More information about the Soot-list mailing list