[Soot-list] Jimple local to source expression

[Patrick Lam]

On 08/25/2012 07:39 PM, Marc-Andre Laverdiere-Papineau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm late to the party on this one, but please bear with me :)
>
> How can I run soot in such a way that none of that information gets
> lost? Do I have to disable all optimisations?

Even that won't work. Soot does transformations internally, because the 
primary goal was to produce bytecode that ran about as fast as the 
original bytecode on early JVMs. The default design assumption was that 
the input would be bytecode, not Java code.

I don't know what happens if you don't transform the Jimple at all. I 
think there's a switch to do that, but I can't remember what it is.

pat