[Soot-list] Phantom Classes and CFGs

[Marc-Andre Laverdiere-Papineau]

Hello,

I have read a paper that was just published from Gomes et al.
http://www.nada.kth.se/~dilian/Papers/fase14.pdf

Essentially, their article is about over-approximating the call targets 
and exceptional edges in the CFG when a method is unknown. This supports 
incremental compilation as a side-benefit.

I was wondering how Soot is handling the same lack of information 
(Phantom Classes). Are we also injecting conservative exceptional edges? 
Are we already doing all this???

P.S. They also boast that they are faster than Soot without giving any 
experimental results. I'm going to stop now, before I say any bad words.

Regards,

-- 
Marc-André Laverdière-Papineau
Doctorant - PhD Candidate