[Soot-list] Best class to extend new type of statement for parameter

[Marc-André Laverdière]

Hello Utsav,

I don't understand what is wrong with FieldRef (and its subclasses) that
you would need a new kind of Stmt... what is the problem you are tying
to solve?

Marc-André Laverdière-Papineau
Doctorant - PhD Candidate

On 03/24/2014 08:10 AM, Utsav Chokshi wrote:
> Hello soot-community,
> Which is best class (that implements unit interface) to extend, for
> introducing new stmt/unit type in soot for fieldrefs.
> Basically I want new class that encloses member variable (i.e.
> sootfield)and related properties and implement unit interface.
> I am currently thinking about abstractRefTypeInst ( I know inst is
> related with grimple, not with jimple.)
> Or shall I simply extend AbstractUnit?
> 
> - Utsav Chokshi
> [ Intern ,TCS Innovation Labs , Pune, India]
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Soot-list mailing list
> Soot-list at sable.mcgill.ca
> http://mailman.cs.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/soot-list
>