Re: [abc] ecoop length

Sascha is adding a few more compile-time numbers. I checked and
we do need to be 25 pages, since I have to enter this in the
web submission form.

We might have to chop one other small thing to insert the new compile-time
numbers. However, read through the rest and check it, then we can
revisit the compile-time numbers.

Cheers, Laurie

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
| McGill University |
| 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
| 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
| Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
| CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Damien Sereni wrote:

> I've commented these two bits out, and we're exactly 25 pages now...
> I've also had a look at the new compile time numbers and it seems that
> the story for 6.2 is still pretty much the same
>
> I'm printing a copy now to go through everything carefully again, but
> I'm not editing at the moment
>
> Cheers
> Damien
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:22:23 -0500 (EST), Prof. Laurie HENDREN
> <hendren@sable.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> > I agree with Oege about what to cut, although I'm not so sure a
> > half page over is a huge problem.
> >
> > Laurie
> >
> > +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
> > | McGill University |
> > | 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
> > | 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
> > | Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
> > | CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
> > +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Oege de Moor wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > In the CC version, we commented out parts of the itd section (the para
> > > about interface itds) and the synthetic advice thing. Both of these could
> > > go again, I think. If you search for %\begin{comment} it's easy to find
> > > these places.
> > >
> > > It may be better not to cut out concrete examples...
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Damien Sereni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > We're about half a page over as it stands, and the compile times
> > > > section is set to get a little bit longer... While a page over is
> > > > probably not too much of a problem I guess it's best avoided.
> > > >
> > > > Beyond the usual squishing of things / using shorter words, I think
> > > > there's a couple of places where we can shorten it by removing what
> > > > seems to be inessential material...
> > > >
> > > > What are people's thoughts on removing these? Any strong feelings
> > > > about those bits of the paper? They probably don't all need to go, so
> > > > any preferences if one of them is cut?
> > > >
> > > > - p.5, in the declare warning example, could cut the printout of the
> > > > warning message (together with the last sentence of the paragraph
> > > > above)
> > > > - p. 14, could remove the example in AspectInfo + code generation
> > > > section, replace with general point that we pass the this pointer to
> > > > the ITD methods in the aspect
> > > > - p. 18-19, could remove the "synthetic advice" subsection (as seems
> > > > to have been done in the CC version)
> > > >
> > > > D
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Damien Sereni
> Oxford University Computing Laboratory
> Wolfson Building, Parks Road
> Oxford OX1 3QD
> UK
>
> dsereni@gmail.com / dsereni@comlab.ox.ac.uk
> http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/work/damien.sereni
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 18:04:33 2004