Re: [abc] ecoop length

I've commented these two bits out, and we're exactly 25 pages now...
I've also had a look at the new compile time numbers and it seems that
the story for 6.2 is still pretty much the same

 I'm printing a copy now to go through everything carefully again, but
I'm not editing at the moment

Cheers
Damien

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:22:23 -0500 (EST), Prof. Laurie HENDREN
<hendren@sable.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> I agree with Oege about what to cut, although I'm not so sure a
> half page over is a huge problem.
>
> Laurie
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
> | McGill University |
> | 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
> | 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
> | Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
> | CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Oege de Moor wrote:
>
> >
> > In the CC version, we commented out parts of the itd section (the para
> > about interface itds) and the synthetic advice thing. Both of these could
> > go again, I think. If you search for %\begin{comment} it's easy to find
> > these places.
> >
> > It may be better not to cut out concrete examples...
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Damien Sereni wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We're about half a page over as it stands, and the compile times
> > > section is set to get a little bit longer... While a page over is
> > > probably not too much of a problem I guess it's best avoided.
> > >
> > > Beyond the usual squishing of things / using shorter words, I think
> > > there's a couple of places where we can shorten it by removing what
> > > seems to be inessential material...
> > >
> > > What are people's thoughts on removing these? Any strong feelings
> > > about those bits of the paper? They probably don't all need to go, so
> > > any preferences if one of them is cut?
> > >
> > > - p.5, in the declare warning example, could cut the printout of the
> > > warning message (together with the last sentence of the paragraph
> > > above)
> > > - p. 14, could remove the example in AspectInfo + code generation
> > > section, replace with general point that we pass the this pointer to
> > > the ITD methods in the aspect
> > > - p. 18-19, could remove the "synthetic advice" subsection (as seems
> > > to have been done in the CC version)
> > >
> > > D
> > >
> >
>
>

-- 
Damien Sereni
Oxford University Computing Laboratory
Wolfson Building, Parks Road
Oxford OX1 3QD
UK
dsereni@gmail.com / dsereni@comlab.ox.ac.uk
http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/work/damien.sereni