Re: [abc] ecoop length

I agree with Oege about what to cut, although I'm not so sure a
half page over is a huge problem.

Laurie

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Laurie Hendren, Professor, School of Computer Science |
| McGill University |
| 318 McConnell Engineering Building tel: (514) 398-7391 |
| 3480 University Street fax: (514) 398-3883 |
| Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7 hendren@cs.mcgill.ca |
| CANADA http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/~hendren |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Oege de Moor wrote:

>
> In the CC version, we commented out parts of the itd section (the para
> about interface itds) and the synthetic advice thing. Both of these could
> go again, I think. If you search for %\begin{comment} it's easy to find
> these places.
>
> It may be better not to cut out concrete examples...
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Damien Sereni wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We're about half a page over as it stands, and the compile times
> > section is set to get a little bit longer... While a page over is
> > probably not too much of a problem I guess it's best avoided.
> >
> > Beyond the usual squishing of things / using shorter words, I think
> > there's a couple of places where we can shorten it by removing what
> > seems to be inessential material...
> >
> > What are people's thoughts on removing these? Any strong feelings
> > about those bits of the paper? They probably don't all need to go, so
> > any preferences if one of them is cut?
> >
> > - p.5, in the declare warning example, could cut the printout of the
> > warning message (together with the last sentence of the paragraph
> > above)
> > - p. 14, could remove the example in AspectInfo + code generation
> > section, replace with general point that we pass the this pointer to
> > the ITD methods in the aspect
> > - p. 18-19, could remove the "synthetic advice" subsection (as seems
> > to have been done in the CC version)
> >
> > D
> >
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 16:22:30 2004