Re: [abc] ecoop length

From: Oege de Moor <Oege.de.Moor@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon Dec 20 2004 - 16:20:17 GMT

In the CC version, we commented out parts of the itd section (the para
about interface itds) and the synthetic advice thing. Both of these could
go again, I think. If you search for %\begin{comment} it's easy to find
these places.

It may be better not to cut out concrete examples...

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Damien Sereni wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We're about half a page over as it stands, and the compile times
> section is set to get a little bit longer... While a page over is
> probably not too much of a problem I guess it's best avoided.
>
> Beyond the usual squishing of things / using shorter words, I think
> there's a couple of places where we can shorten it by removing what
> seems to be inessential material...
>
> What are people's thoughts on removing these? Any strong feelings
> about those bits of the paper? They probably don't all need to go, so
> any preferences if one of them is cut?
>
> - p.5, in the declare warning example, could cut the printout of the
> warning message (together with the last sentence of the paragraph
> above)
> - p. 14, could remove the example in AspectInfo + code generation
> section, replace with general point that we pass the this pointer to
> the ITD methods in the aspect
> - p. 18-19, could remove the "synthetic advice" subsection (as seems
> to have been done in the CC version)
>
> D
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 16:20:28 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 20 2004 - 16:30:03 GMT