[abc] test run results

From: Ganesh Sittampalam <ganesh@earth.li>
Date: Sun Mar 19 2006 - 03:11:16 GMT

Pass: 945 (down 20)
Fail: 37 (up 20)
Skipped: 105 (no change)

Lost:
1019: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic tracematch
1020: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Plus and Star
1021: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Alternation
1022: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic variable bindings
1023: abctests/tracematches/failsafe - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 1
1024: abctests/tracematches/failsafe3 - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 2
1025: abctests/tracematches/failsafe4 - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 3
1026: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: NoSuchMethodError (shouldn't occur..)
1027: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Negative bindings should be checked correctly...
1028: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: states where x may be bound or unbound
1029: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic around tracematch
1030: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Around match with multiple bindings.
1031: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing the `perthread' modifier
1032: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing self-applying around TM-advice
1033: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing if pointcuts in symbols
1034: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: When there is some() advice but not per-symbol
1035: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic primitive variable bindings
1036: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Primitive bindings don't cause errors.
1037: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Primitive negative bindings should be checked correctly...
1209: abctests/tracematches - Using private pointcut variables in an if(..) in a TM symbol

Gained:
Received on Sun Mar 19 03:11:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 06 2007 - 16:13:27 GMT