aargh... caused by the dependency on apache commons collections?
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
> Pass: 945 (down 20)
> Fail: 37 (up 20)
> Skipped: 105 (no change)
>
> Lost:
> 1019: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic tracematch
> 1020: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Plus and Star
> 1021: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Alternation
> 1022: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic variable bindings
> 1023: abctests/tracematches/failsafe - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 1
> 1024: abctests/tracematches/failsafe3 - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 2
> 1025: abctests/tracematches/failsafe4 - Failsafe enumerations: tracematch version 3
> 1026: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: NoSuchMethodError (shouldn't occur..)
> 1027: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Negative bindings should be checked correctly...
> 1028: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: states where x may be bound or unbound
> 1029: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic around tracematch
> 1030: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Around match with multiple bindings.
> 1031: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing the `perthread' modifier
> 1032: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing self-applying around TM-advice
> 1033: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Testing if pointcuts in symbols
> 1034: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: When there is some() advice but not per-symbol
> 1035: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Basic primitive variable bindings
> 1036: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Primitive bindings don't cause errors.
> 1037: abctests/tracematches - Tracematches: Primitive negative bindings should be checked correctly...
> 1209: abctests/tracematches - Using private pointcut variables in an if(..) in a TM symbol
>
> Gained:
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 19 10:28:18 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 06 2007 - 16:13:27 GMT