Re: [abc] POPL paper changes

From: Pavel Avgustinov <pavel.avgustinov@magdalen.oxford.ac.uk>
Date: Mon Oct 16 2006 - 14:50:05 BST

Good plan -- I'm about to take a look at reviewer #2.

- P

On Monday 16 October 2006 12:33, Elnar Hajiyev wrote:
> This email is addressed to all authors of the POPL paper, but primarily to
> Pavel, Julian and Neil.
>
> The deadline is this coming Thursday, so we should act now and quickly.
>
> After a discussion this Oege, he said that he would like to think a bit
> more carefully what kind of example we may need to add as a good starting
> point of the more complex machinery. So we can leave that aspect for the
> moment and concentrate on eliminating all the minor corrections. We should
> not care for the moment of going above the 12 pages limit.
>
> I suggest that each of us takes a reviewer and deals with all the minor
> corrections of that reviewer. Preferably, we should write how we are going
> to deal with each comment in an email (for everyone to see and agree),
> before actually applying the proposed changes. I am going to start with the
> reviewer #1.
>
> Hope we shall finish by tomorrow and can then start addressing the major
> issue(s).
>
> Cheers,
> Elnar
Received on Mon Oct 16 14:49:56 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 06 2007 - 16:13:30 GMT