[Soot-list] Re(de)compilation of unmodified .class files

[Patrick Lam]

Eric Bodden wrote:
>> That functionality is not implemented in Soot.
> 
> Patrick, if we know that B does not need to be processed can we not
> just set B as a library class in this case. I think that would
> automatically prevent B from being processed by transformers. (B would
> have to be loaded to signature level at the least though, I believe)

Yes. But I don't know what Mario is trying to accomplish, so it's hard
to say. Perhaps he doesn't need to specify --app A.

pat